Introduction
How To Use
How To Help
Send a Comment

Index A→Z
List Projects

Latest:
  Changes by Users
  Images
  Comments
  Features and Fixes

Observations:
  Create Observation
  Sort by Date

Species Lists:
  Create List
  Sort by Date
  Sort by Title

Account:
  Login
  Create Account

Languages:
  Deutsch
  English
  Español
  Português

Contributors
Site Stats
Translator’s Note

Colors from Agaricus

Powered by:
Ruby on Rails
Preferred browser:
FireFox

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Find:
Observation: Fungi sp. L. (14731)

When: 2008-11-29
Collection location: Paul Bishop’s Jones Creek Tree Farm, Beavercreek, Clackamas Co., OR [Search]
Who: Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
No herbarium specimen

Notes: Many fruiting on a single Douglas-fir log about 2-3 years old.

Proposed Names:   Propose Another Name

Proposed Name User Community Vote
  Tuberale   -8% (2)   Eye
Used references: Arora’s Mushrooms Demystified, p. 402. May not be exact species. Veil is faint, a mere white line on the stipe, and somewhat attached to the cap rim. Dr. Matt Trappe identified as G. autumnalis, but does not key out to that in Arora.
  douglas   55% (1)   Eyes
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye = Observer’s choice Eyes = Current consensus

Comments:   Add Comment

Created: 2008-11-30 21:03:39
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
Summary: Gymnopilus can be small.

There are a large number of species of Gymnopilus that are small, and can be found to be only 1 cm in size. Also many, if not most, species of Galerina do not have an annulus, and most that do have one, it isn’t very persistant. Those aren’t good features to decide on a genus.

Arora is not a good source to decide on Galerina species, and not that good a source for Gymnopilus…

Just one look at the spores here would probably get you genus a lot faster than this discussion…

Created: 2008-11-30 11:54:13
By: Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
Summary: Some bark still on trunk

This was growing on Douglas fir. Most moss growing on Douglas fir would be on the bark layer, which is conspicuous by its absence here. As I recall, even the bark remaining on the trunk did not have a noticeable amount of moss.

Created: 2008-11-30 11:50:33
By: Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
Summary: No brown on cap.

According to Arora, there should be some form of brown on Gymnopilus, so that probably rules out this observation. In addition, most Gymnopilus are medium to largish mushrooms, and this is, at most, 3cm across the cap, not at all large. Still checking on the other possibilities you mention, because Galerina should have a more obvious annulus than these do.

Created: 2008-11-29 17:23:03
By: Darvin DeShazer (darv)
Summary: Gymnopilus

I would start with Gymnopilus on these. That is my first gut reaction.

19351

Created: 2008-11-29 16:19:42
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
Summary: These are fairly uncertain…

It is uncertain what these might be, although they are certainly not G. hypnorum (although in detail it is confused as to what is G. hypnorum…). The species G. hypnorum, in any case macroscopically, is on moss covered logs mostly, where the moss is important here, also the cap is thin conical and striate. These are on a log with no moss, not conical, not striate, and I’m not sure if they are hygrophanous (another character). So, with this lack of those characters, I’m not sure they are Galerina, and could also be Tubaria and even one of the really small Gymnopilus (and maybe even something else…).

Observation Created: Sat Nov 29 15:16:38 -0800 2008
Last Modified: Sat Nov 29 15:16:38 -0800 2008 by Daniel B. Wheeler (Tuberale)
Viewed: 36 times, last viewed: Wed Dec 31 09:39:02 -0800 2008
Show Log

Images:

30525
Fungi sp. L. (30525)

30526
Fungi sp. L. (30526)

30527
Fungi sp. L. (30527)

30528
Fungi sp. L. (30528)